as revealed by immunoblot analyses carried out at day 2, 4 and 6 of differentiation. Unexpectedly, an increase in DLK levels was also observed in rosiglitazone-treated control and DLK knockdown adipocytes, suggesting the potential involvement of an activated form of PPARc in DLK expression. Taken together, these results indicate that rosiglitazone can overcome the inhibitory effect of DLK depletion on adipocyte Ki-8751 web differentiation and suggest that the loss of DLK principally inhibits the differentiation program of 3T3L1 cells by preventing the expression of PPARc2. Discussion Adipogenesis is a complex process governed by a wide range of regulatory proteins, including transcription factors, kinases and Role of DLK in Adipogenesis hormones. Adding to this complexity, our results identify the MLK family member DLK as a novel regulator of adipocyte differentiation. Immunoblot analyses of various mouse adipose depots indeed demonstrated that DLK was specifically expressed in mesenteric white and brown adipose tissue, suggesting a role for this protein in differentiation and function of particular adipocyte subpopulations. Using the 3T3-L1 preadipocyte cell line as a model, we then showed that the protein level of DLK gradually 5 Role of DLK in Adipogenesis increased upon differentiation like the adipogenic markers PPARc2, adiponectin and fatty acid synthase. This increase in DLK expression was paralleled by either an increase or decrease in phosphorylation of the MAPKs ERK, p38 and JNK, which are recognized to have both positive and negative regulatory effects on adipocyte differentiation. Using gene silencing of DLK by RNA interference, we demonstrated that this protein is essential for lipid accumulation and expression of the two master regulators of adipocyte differentiation, C/EBPa and PPARc2. In agreement with this result, we found that DLK depletion was accompanied by decreased expression of adiponectin and fatty acid synthase that are downstream genes of C/EBPa, PPARc and SREBP-1c, a transcription factor involved in fatty acid metabolism, respectively. This effect was reversed by the PPARc agonist rosiglitazone, suggesting that the absence of DLK does not impair the capacity of an activated form of PPARc to promote adipogenesis, and that DLK action takes place upstream of PPARc. The capacity of ligand-activated PPARc to rescue adipogenesis in 19478133 DLK-depleted cells is in agreement with previous work showing the relative contribution of the two different PPARc isoforms, PPARc1 and PPARc2, to adipogenesis. In their study, using engineered 3T3-L1 cells devoid of PPARc1 and PPARc2, Ren et al. demonstrated that only ectopic expression of PPARc2 can induce adipocyte differentiation in the absence of exogenous ligand. Although it is not clear why this difference is observed, Werman and colleagues reported that PPARc2 contains a constitutive activation function in the N-terminus that is up to 10-fold stronger than that of PPARc1. Moreover, it has been found that the 22440900 N-terminus of PPARc2 binds a small 
protein, termed PGC-2, itself having adipogenic action. Thus, combined to these findings, our results suggest that the absence of DLK most likely prevents adipocyte conversion of 3T3-L1 cells by impairing the expression of PPARc2. Of particular interest was the finding that neither the expression nor the nuclear localization of C/EBPb was affected by the loss of DLK. This suggests that the early events in adipogenesis such as CREB activation by protein